The hidden harm of shark finning.
Toxic Food Webs
Mercury contamination may affect sharks, in addition to other challenges they face. Before we can understand how Hg affects sharks, we must characterize mercury in muscle tissue for species captured in southern Florida and determine how much of that mercury is in the toxic form of MeHg. We also will develop a model to correlate total Hg and shark length, in hopes that length may be an estimator of mercury concentration for each species. This may be useful when considering human health advisories, such as the Federal Drug Administration’s 1.0 μg/g (ww) action level for human health concerns.
Mercury contamination is a common concern for consumers of seafood. Fish are more commonly consumed than sharks, so most of the research with mercury (Hg) has focused on different teleost fish species such as tunas, swordfish, and salmon. Recently, researchers have been concerned with Hg contamination in sharks; both for human health reasons and for the overall health of the animals. Sharks are top predators but differences in Hg between species exist. Three published studies have assessed mercury levels in Florida sharks (Adams & McMichael, 1999; Heuter et al., 1995; Nam et al., 2011). We are currently collecting data on multiple species over a large area to compare with previous studies and increase our understanding of how sharks accumulate mercury.
Recent Study Highlights & Publications
Between 2006 and 2011, we collected and sampled 589 sharks of 11 different species. Our preliminary data suggests that Hg levels in Atlantic sharpnose averaged less than previous studies in Florida, whereas Hg values in Blacknose, Blacktip, Bull, Caribbean reef, Lemon, Sandbar, and Tiger sharks averaged higher than other studies in Florida. We also sampled Great hammerhead and Nurse sharks but no previously published studies sampled these species in Florida. We are developing relationships for each species between predicted Hg and total length to determine the threshold length that exceeds human health advisories. This gives greater resolution to broad-cast advisory levels, providing length so that consumers can decide if they are at risk when eating certain sharks. From a shark conservation standpoint, we compare different species and look at their preferred prey types to better understand how mercury is moving through the food web and into sharks. Though there is a lot of research to be conducted still, we may trace this mercury back to its sources and help prevent it from finding its way into our oceans and into sharks.
(1) Hammerschlag N, Davis DA, Mondo K, Seely MS, Murch SJ, Glover WB, Divoll T, Evers DC, Mash DC. (2016). Cyanobacterial Neurotoxin BMAA and Mercury in Sharks. Toxins 2016, 8, 238.
(2) Rumbold D, Wasno B, Hammerschlag N, Volety A. (2014). Mercury accumulation in sharks from the coastal waters of Southwest Florida. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology; DOI 10.1007/s00244-014-0050-6
(3) Mondo K, Hammerschlag N, Basile M, Pablo J, Banack SA, Mash DC. (2012). Cyanobacterial Neurotoxin Î²-N-Methylamino-L-alanine (BMAA) in Shark Fins, Marine Drugs, 10(2), 509-520; doi:10.3390/md10020509
(4) Brand LE, Pablo J, Compton A, Hammerschlag N, Mash DC. (2010). Cyanobacterial Blooms and the Occurrence of the neurotoxin beta-N-methylamino-L-alanine (BMAA) in South Florida Aquatic Food Webs. Harmful Algae 9: 620–635 The Scientific Publications are also available in Mandarin Chinese HERE